Comments on: Is Google putting more weight on brands in rankings?

By: hprof1

hprof1 — Mon, 08 Mar 2010 17:35:54 +0000

first !

By: Busbyhead

Busbyhead — Mon, 08 Mar 2010 16:37:41 +0000

second !

By: PhongTheory

PhongTheory — Mon, 08 Mar 2010 15:44:06 +0000

thanks for explaining absolutely nothing about this “change”… yet again.

By: wa7son

wa7son — Mon, 08 Mar 2010 15:02:18 +0000

Question: “Are Google putting more weight on brands more in search results?”

Answer: “No we don’t, we just changed something so that brands might now be appearing higher up on the list”

- Well isn’t that what the woman was asking?

By: spamblogger

spamblogger — Mon, 08 Mar 2010 14:53:52 +0000

)))))

By: MattCutts

MattCutts — Mon, 08 Mar 2010 14:50:45 +0000

wa7son, the video confirms that there was an algorithmic change, but that we didn’t and don’t think of the ranking change in terms of promoting brands.

By: gvanderleun

gvanderleun — Mon, 08 Mar 2010 14:05:06 +0000

Good spokesman for Google.

By: zazammweightloss

zazammweightloss — Mon, 08 Mar 2010 14:04:13 +0000

Very helpful video – Thanks Matt

Can you please answer this with a yes or no. Does Google give more pr or preference to sites done in Joomla , word press Drupal Or other such OS compared to say frontpage or DW or CSS? There are a LOT of info saying you ( google ) will give Drupal, Joomla and such better preferences?

By: jmorg1

jmorg1 — Mon, 08 Mar 2010 13:11:26 +0000

How much did IBM pay you for that blatant advertising?

By: bmeister77

bmeister77 — Mon, 08 Mar 2010 12:51:16 +0000

The Brand Algorithm will probably be triggered with terms like ‘buy’,'company’,’[geographic target]‘,’sale’,'shop’,'order’ etc. etc. matched by a ‘new’ database of brands (Chambers of Commerce databases etc.).